JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 21, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Juan Carlos Rodriguez Pineda

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Inexistencia de argumentación, razonamiento o motivación
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica.

La demanda se rechazó porque el escrito de corrección allegado por el demandante no cumplió con los criterios señalados en el auto de inadmisión.

Ante el incumplimiento de los requisitos de oportunidad y de carga argumentativa, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZAR el recurso impetrado en esta oportunidad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (23 points)
  1. Primero. RECHAZAR, el recurso de suplica presentado por el ciudadano Juan Carlos Rodriguez Pineda contra el auto del 21 de septiembre de 2021 por medio del cual se rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad en el expediente D-14392.
  2. Segundo. COMUNICAR, a traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte, el contenido de esta decision al ciudadano, indicandole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
  3. Tercero. ARCHIVAR el expediente D-14392.
  4. ANTONIO JOSE LIZARAZO OCAMPO
  5. Presidente
  6. DIANA FAJARDO RIVERA
  7. Magistrada
  8. No participa-
  9. JORGE ENRIQUE IBANEZ NAJAR
  10. Magistrado
  11. ALEJANDRO LINARES CANTILLO
  12. Magistrado
  13. PAOLA ANDREA MENESES MOSQUERA
  14. Magistrada
  15. GLORIA STELLA ORTIZ DELGADO
  16. Magistrada
  17. CRISTINA PARDO SCHLESINGER
  18. Magistrada
  19. JOSE FERNANDO REYES CUARTAS
  20. Magistrado
  21. ALBERTO ROJAS RIOS
  22. Magistrado
  23. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Alejandro Linares Cantillo
Reporting justice
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Magistrado
✓
Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo
Presidente
✓
Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
Magistrado
✓
Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
Magistrado
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar
Magistrado
✓
José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Magistrado
✓
Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez
Magistrado
✓
Paola Andrea Meneses Mosquera
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.